Resumen:
Purpose
To estimate the proportion and timing of assistive technology (AT) device delivery during paediatric inpatient rehabilitation and identify factors associated with delivery rates.
Materials and methods
We conducted a retrospective cohort study at a neurorehabilitation centre in Argentina, including patients <22 years with hospital stays >20 days, discharged between January and December 2024, and with at least one mobility- or participation-related AT prescription. The primary outcome was time from prescription to documented delivery during hospitalisation. Delivery probabilities were estimated with Kaplan–Meier curves and compared using the log-rank test. Factors associated with delivery were analysed with multivariate Cox regression, with clustered standard errors by patient.
Results
Thirty-three patients were included (mean age 10.6 years; 39.4% female). Sixty devices were prescribed; 41 (68.3%) were delivered during the inpatient stay. Median delivery time after prescription was 27 days (IQR 10–64). Cumulative delivery probabilities at 30, 60, and 90 days were 45%, 64.3%, and 72.8%, respectively. In the multivariate model, postural or self-propelled wheelchairs had a lower delivery rate than other devices (adjusted HR 0.32, 95% CI 0.12–0.86; p = 0.02). Devices processed through provincial public health insurance were delivered more slowly compared with social security, private coverage, or out-of-pocket payment (adjusted HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.22–0.76; p < 0.01). No significant associations were observed for prescription timing or clinical priority classification.
Conclusion
Nearly one-third of prescribed AT devices for mobility and participation were not delivered before discharge, and delivery times were often prolonged, particularly for wheelchairs and devices processed through provincial public insurance.
