Resumen:
Background
Although proven very efficacious as treatment for Parkinson's disease by Schwab as far back as the nineteen-fifties, and later confirmed by Cotzias and colleagues in the early nineteen-seventies, use of intermittent subcutaneous injections of the dopamine agonist apomorphine remains limited worldwide.
Objectives
To review evidence regarding use of intermittent, on-demand apomorphine as a treatment for off-period disability in Parkinson's disease.
Methods
A PRISMA-compliant structured literature search was carried out with a focus on clinical effect (motor improvement, daily off time decrease; latency, duration), antiemetic prophylaxis, and adverse events.
Results
Fifty-eight studies were evaluated. Apomorphine administration route was subcutaneous in 29 (50%), sublingual in 14 (24.1%), intranasal in 6 (10.3%), inhaled in 5 (8.6%), rectal in 3 (5.2%) and transdermal in 1 (1.7%). Irrespective of the route, motor disability improved 19–74% and daily off time decreased 36–68%, with subcutaneous having the fastest onset of action ranging from 6 to 24 minutes and lasting 28 to 96 minutes. Antiemetic prophylaxis was used in almost all studies. Systemic side effects like nausea and yawning were mild and well tolerated, but sedation led to discontinuation of subcutaneous apomorphine in 5.5%. Local side effects to subcutaneous administration did not result in discontinuation. Stomatitis with the early sublingual formulations led to discontinuation in nearly half of patients and was reduced to 16.7% with novel film strips.
Conclusions
Intermittent subcutaneous injections remain the most reliable and safest route of apomorphine administration, with an efficacy for off period treatment supported by nearly four decades of clinical experience.